It is undeniable that the borders between fashion and
celebrity culture have become increasingly easier to cross over the last decade.
People who are deemed to be famous whether owing to their hard work, innate
talent or merely because their presence is captured in the public realm of
media are often seen wearing designer clothes in a process quite often intended
to promote both the designer and the celebrity wearer. However, when the worlds
of sartorial creativity and innocuous celebrity become dangerously blurred and
both arenas fail to improve on what they can contribute to society, the results
can be utmost disappointing. And this is what one needs to bear in mind in
order to understand any critique of James Small’s runway presentation of his
Autumn/Winter 2012 menswear collection, shown during London Fashion Week on 23 February
2012.
At The Style Examiner, we have been following Small’s
ascending career since he took his first steps in the calendar of fashion weeks
with a promising Autumn/Winter 2010 menswear range. We were tremendously
impressed with his ‘Marching Band’ collection for Autumn/Winter 2011, where the
choices of fabrics and patterns were perfectly allied to competent tailoring
techniques. However, his ‘Dark Arctic’ Autumn/Winter 2012 collection could not
fail our expectations any more than it did.
James Small AW 12/13 from Low Brain TV on Vimeo.
Other than being extremely limited when it came to the
number of looks (we counted 15 in total), the collection’s colours and patterns
were disappointingly repetitive. Even interesting details such as external diagonal
pockets and belted coats did not manage to save the overall lack of originality
of a collection that focused mostly on manifestations of unflattering and derivative
outerwear: coats were oversized by resorting to fake grey or black fur in its
entirety or in parts (either sleeves or in the front and back of a blazer), or
incorporated belts tied around the waist or buttoned to one side. Trousers came
in the form of skinny jeans, athletic pants with contrasting arch on the
inseam, or baggy grey dungarees with straps that crossed at the back, worn over
flannel shirts. The sombre ambiance of the venue (the grand room in London’s
Freemason’s Hall) did not help the dull colour palette which consisted of black, greys, and blues.
For buyers and journalists who attend as many fashion shows
as possible to analyse the creativity and potential on display, the fact that
James Small’s runway show was the very last of a hectic week didn’t help.
However, most people were forced to wait even further for the presentation to
start until a bevy of celebrities arrived late to take their front row seats.
What was irritating (although not atypical of many runways shows these days)
was that these celebrities were not renowned fashion editors or influential
buyers keen to see the collection, but a parade of Small’s friends (Sadie Frost, Jamie Hince, Mr Hudson, Kate
Moss, or Jo Wood, not to mention N’Dubz’s Fazer Rawson as one
of the models on the runway) who gathered not to see the clothes but to support
him and grace the audience with their social status.
Although it is nice to have your friends cheering you on, it
is crucial to realise that a runway show is essentially an opportunity for
business and if the key audiences cannot see the clothes, then there is little
point in doing it. An online search for James Small’s Autumn/Winter 2012 collection
the day after the show retrieved more photographs and information about the
celebrities in attendance than about the designer or the clothes. Ultimately, this
perverse result addresses James Small’s concern (as he was quoted claiming in
an interview) that his collections are not being bought.
We will not dismiss
James Small’s talent and intend to keep following his future collections as we
have seen what he is capable of achieving. However, in the future we hope to be
able to find out more about James as a fashion designer through his clothes
than James as someone whose fashion shows are known for the celebrities on the
front row.
Photographs courtesy of vogue.co.uk.















No comments:
Post a Comment